WhatsApp

LMR-400 vs RG58: Which Coaxial Cable Should You Choose?

LMR-400 vs RG58: Which Coaxial Cable Should You Choose?

Published by Wassalat Technical Team

Choosing between LMR-400 and RG58 coaxial cables is one of the most common dilemmas for anyone setting up a wireless network, radio system, or antenna installation. Both are 50Ω cables, but their performance, construction, and applications are worlds apart.

This comprehensive guide compares LMR-400 and RG58 side-by-side—covering signal loss, construction, flexibility, cost, and ideal applications—so you can make the right choice for your project.

LMR-400 vs RG58 Coaxial Cable Comparison

Quick Overview

The short answer is: for most modern, performance-critical applications, LMR-400 is the superior choice. The core difference lies in signal loss (attenuation) and intended application.

LMR-400 – The Low-Loss Champion

What it is: A professional-grade, ultra-low-loss 50Ω coaxial cable designed for high-performance, long-distance RF applications.

Key Strengths: Ultra-low signal loss, high frequency support (6 GHz), outdoor-rated, durable

Best For: Long cable runs, outdoor antennas, base stations, WISPs, 4G/5G, WiFi

RG58 – The Flexible & Affordable Option

What it is: A thin, flexible, budget-friendly 50Ω coaxial cable that has been a staple in the RF world for decades.

Key Strengths: Excellent flexibility, low cost, easy to work with

Best For: Short patch cables, test leads, internal equipment connections, mobile installations

? Key Insight: Both cables are 50Ω and can be used for the same applications. However, LMR-400 delivers dramatically better performance over distance. The choice is about performance vs. budget.

Key Specifications Comparison

Parameter LMR-400 RG58
Impedance 50Ω 50Ω
Max Frequency 6 GHz 1 GHz
Center Conductor Solid Copper (BC) Stranded or Solid Tinned Copper
Conductor Size 13 AWG (1.78 mm) 20 AWG (0.81 mm)
Dielectric Type Foam PE Solid PE
Shield Type Foil + Double Braid Single Braid (90-95%)
Outer Diameter 10.29 mm (0.405") 4.95 mm (0.195")
Jacket Material PE (Outdoor Rated) PVC (Indoor Only)
Flexibility ⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Weight (per 100 ft) ~12 lbs ~3 lbs
Cost (per 100 ft) ~$80-120 ~$20-30

Signal Loss (Attenuation) Comparison

Signal loss is the single most important difference between LMR-400 and RG58. LMR-400 has dramatically lower loss at all frequencies.

Attenuation Table

Frequency LMR-400 (dB/100ft) RG58 (dB/100ft) LMR-400 Advantage
30 MHz 0.8 dB 2.5 dB 68% less loss
100 MHz 1.5 dB 4.5 dB 67% less loss
400 MHz 3.0 dB 9.0 dB 67% less loss
900 MHz 3.9 dB 16.0 dB 76% less loss
1500 MHz 5.1 dB 22.0 dB 77% less loss
2400 MHz (2.4 GHz) 6.7 dB >30 dB LMR-400 only viable option
5800 MHz (5.8 GHz) 11.0 dB Not Recommended RG58 unusable at this frequency

Real-World Impact

Here's what these numbers mean in practice:

  • At 100 MHz (FM Radio): A 100-foot run of LMR-400 loses 1.5 dB; RG58 loses 4.5 dB. The LMR-400 signal is twice as strong at the receiver.
  • At 900 MHz (Cellular): A 100-foot run of LMR-400 loses 3.9 dB; RG58 loses 16.0 dB. The LMR-400 signal is over 15 times stronger at the receiver.
  • At 2.4 GHz (WiFi): LMR-400 can run 100 feet with acceptable loss. RG58 is essentially unusable at this frequency for any run over a few feet.
⚠️ Critical: At 2.4 GHz (WiFi) and 5.8 GHz (5GHz WiFi), RG58 is NOT recommended for runs longer than 1-2 feet. The signal loss is catastrophic. Always use LMR-400 or better for WiFi antenna feeds.

Construction Differences

The physical construction of these cables explains their performance differences:

LMR-400 Construction

  • Center Conductor: 13 AWG solid copper (thicker = lower resistance)
  • Dielectric: Foam polyethylene (air bubbles reduce loss)
  • Shield: Foil + double copper braid (triple shielding)
  • Jacket: Polyethylene (PE) – UV and water resistant
  • Result: Ultra-low loss, weather-resistant, high durability

RG58 Construction

  • Center Conductor: 20 AWG stranded or solid tinned copper (thinner = higher resistance)
  • Dielectric: Solid polyethylene (higher loss than foam)
  • Shield: Single copper braid (90-95% coverage)
  • Jacket: PVC (not UV resistant, not for outdoor use)
  • Result: Flexible, low cost, higher loss, indoor only

LMR-400 vs RG58 construction comparison

LMR-400: The Low-Loss Champion

LMR-400 is a professional-grade 50Ω coaxial cable designed for minimal signal loss and maximum performance.

Why Choose LMR-400?

Advantage Benefit
Ultra-Low Signal Loss Run cables 100+ feet without significant signal degradation
High Frequency Support Handles signals up to 6 GHz – perfect for WiFi, 5G, and modern systems
Outdoor Durability PE jacket resists UV, moisture, and temperature extremes
Triple Shielding Foil + double braid provides excellent interference protection
Versatile Works for cellular, WiFi, GPS, amateur radio, and more

Common LMR-400 Applications

  • ? Cellular base stations (4G/5G)
  • ? WiFi access points and outdoor antennas
  • ? WISP and point-to-point wireless links
  • ?️ GPS and GNSS systems
  • ? Amateur radio (HF, VHF, UHF)
  • ? DAS (Distributed Antenna Systems)
  • ? Microwave and backhaul links
✅ Recommendation: If your cable run is more than 10-20 feet, you are installing an outdoor antenna, or you are working with frequencies above 1 GHz, choose LMR-400. The cost is justified by the reliable, high-performance signal it delivers.

RG58: The Flexible & Affordable Option

RG58 is a thinner, more flexible 50Ω cable that has been a staple in the RF world for decades. Its main advantages are low cost and high flexibility.

Why Choose RG58?

Advantage Benefit
Excellent Flexibility Easy to route around tight corners and in cramped spaces
Low Cost Significantly cheaper than LMR-400 – about 75% less expensive
Lightweight Easy to handle and install
Widely Available Readily available at most electronics stores
Good for Short Runs For runs under 10 feet, loss is acceptable for many applications

Common RG58 Applications

  • ? Short patch cables (under 10 feet)
  • ? Test leads and laboratory equipment
  • ? Internal equipment connections
  • ? Mobile installations (vehicles)
  • ? Amateur radio (VHF/UHF)
  • ? Temporary setups
  • ? Prototyping and development
⚠️ Note: RG58 is NOT recommended for:
  • Runs longer than 10-20 feet
  • Outdoor installations (PVC jacket degrades in sunlight)
  • Frequencies above 1 GHz (WiFi, 5G, etc.)
  • High-power transmission

Side-by-Side Comparison Table

Feature LMR-400 RG58
Impedance 50Ω 50Ω
Max Frequency 6 GHz 1 GHz
Conductor Size 13 AWG 20 AWG
Loss @ 100 MHz 1.5 dB/100ft 4.5 dB/100ft
Loss @ 900 MHz 3.9 dB/100ft 16.0 dB/100ft
Loss @ 2.4 GHz 6.7 dB/100ft >30 dB/100ft
Max Recommended Length 100-200 ft 10-20 ft
Shielding Triple (Foil + 2 Braids) Single Braid
Jacket PE (Outdoor) PVC (Indoor)
Outer Diameter 10.29 mm 4.95 mm
Flexibility ⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Cost (per 100 ft) ~$80-120 ~$20-30
Best For Long runs, outdoor, high frequency Short runs, flexible, budget

Applications: When to Use Each

WiFi & Wireless Networks

Scenario Recommended Cable Reason
Outdoor WiFi antenna (2.4/5 GHz) LMR-400 Low loss at high frequencies, outdoor-rated
Indoor router to antenna (short run) LMR-240 or RG58 Short run, flexibility more important
WISP backhaul (long run) LMR-400 or LMR-600 Long distance, minimal loss critical

Cellular / Mobile

Scenario Recommended Cable Reason
4G/5G antenna (long run) LMR-400 Low loss at cellular frequencies
Vehicle antenna (short run) RG58 Flexible, short run, mobile environment
Base station (tower) LMR-400 or HELIAX Professional installation, long distance

Amateur Radio

Scenario Recommended Cable Reason
HF (3-30 MHz) long run LMR-400 or RG-8 Low loss at HF, durable
VHF/UHF (144/440 MHz) LMR-400 Low loss critical at these frequencies
Portable operation RG58 Flexible, lightweight, portable

How to Decide: LMR-400 or RG58?

Flowchart Decision Guide

  1. How long is your cable run?
    • Under 10 feet → Consider RG58
    • 10-20 feet → Either cable works; LMR-400 preferred
    • Over 20 feet → Choose LMR-400
  2. What frequency are you using?
    • Below 100 MHz → Both work; RG58 may be sufficient for short runs
    • 100 MHz to 1 GHz → LMR-400 is strongly recommended
    • Above 1 GHz (WiFi, 5G, etc.) → Must use LMR-400
  3. Is the installation outdoors?
    • Yes → Must use LMR-400 (PE jacket)
    • No → Both work; RG58 is more flexible
  4. What is your power level?
    • Low power (under 100W) → Both work
    • High power (100W+) → LMR-400 recommended
  5. What is your budget?
    • Budget-conscious → RG58 for short, indoor runs
    • Performance-critical → Invest in LMR-400

Quick Decision Table

Your Application Recommended Cable
Outdoor WiFi antenna (any length) LMR-400
Long cable run (>20 ft) LMR-400
Cellular 4G/5G antenna LMR-400
Internal patch cable (under 5 ft) RG58
Test equipment leads RG58
Mobile/vehicle installation RG58
Amateur radio base station LMR-400
✅ Simple Rule:
  • Short run, low frequency, indoor, budget-conscious → RG58
  • Long run, high frequency, outdoor, performance-critical → LMR-400

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. What is the main difference between LMR-400 and RG58?

The main difference is signal loss. LMR-400 has significantly lower attenuation (signal loss) than RG58, especially at higher frequencies. LMR-400 also has better shielding and an outdoor-rated jacket.

2. Can I use RG58 for WiFi?

No. RG58 is not recommended for WiFi (2.4 GHz or 5 GHz) runs longer than 1-2 feet. The signal loss is catastrophic. Use LMR-400 or LMR-240 for WiFi applications.

3. Can I use LMR-400 for CB radio?

Yes. LMR-400 works very well for CB radio (27 MHz). However, it's overkill for this application—RG58 or RG-8 would also work fine for CB frequencies.

4. Is LMR-400 worth the extra cost?

For long runs, high frequencies, or outdoor installations, yes, absolutely. The performance difference is dramatic. For short, indoor, low-frequency runs, RG58 is more cost-effective.

5. Can I use RG58 outdoors?

No. RG58 has a PVC jacket that degrades in sunlight. It will crack and fail within 1-2 years outdoors. Use LMR-400 with a PE jacket for outdoor installations.

6. What connectors do LMR-400 and RG58 use?

Both cables use 50Ω connectors. Common options include:

  • LMR-400: N-Type, SMA, UHF/PL-259
  • RG58: BNC, SMA, UHF/PL-259

7. Which cable is more flexible?

RG58 is much more flexible than LMR-400. RG58's 0.195" diameter and stranded conductor make it easy to route in tight spaces.

8. How long can LMR-400 run for 5G?

For 5G Sub-6 (3.5-6 GHz), LMR-400 can run 50-100 feet with acceptable loss. For longer runs, consider LMR-600 or a signal amplifier.

9. How long can RG58 run for VHF?

For VHF (144 MHz), RG58 can run 20-30 feet with acceptable loss. For longer runs, RG8 or LMR-400 is recommended.

10. Is there a cable between LMR-400 and RG58?

Yes. LMR-240 is a good middle-ground option. It's more flexible than LMR-400 but has lower loss than RG58. LMR-195 is another option for shorter runs.

11. Can I use RG58 for 4G LTE?

For short runs (under 10 feet), RG58 can work for 4G LTE. For longer runs, LMR-400 is strongly recommended to maintain signal quality.

12. What is the power handling of LMR-400 vs RG58?

LMR-400 can handle higher power than RG58 due to its thicker conductor. At 100 MHz, LMR-400 can handle ~500W, while RG58 handles ~100W.

? Related Articles

? Need LMR-400 or RG58 Cables?

We stock professional LMR-400 cables for high-performance installations and RG58 for short, flexible connections. Choose the right cable for your application.

Shop Coaxial Cables → View RF Connectors →


Last Updated: July 2026

© 2026 Wassalat. All rights reserved.

Posted in: Coaxial Cables

Leave a comment

Latest posts

Loading...