Choose the right outdoor coaxial cable for your installation. Compare TZC-500/32 vs TZC-500/97, learn about PE...
Published by Wassalat Technical Team
Choosing between LMR-400 and RG58 coaxial cables is one of the most common dilemmas for anyone setting up a wireless network, radio system, or antenna installation. Both are 50Ω cables, but their performance, construction, and applications are worlds apart.
This comprehensive guide compares LMR-400 and RG58 side-by-side—covering signal loss, construction, flexibility, cost, and ideal applications—so you can make the right choice for your project.

The short answer is: for most modern, performance-critical applications, LMR-400 is the superior choice. The core difference lies in signal loss (attenuation) and intended application.
What it is: A professional-grade, ultra-low-loss 50Ω coaxial cable designed for high-performance, long-distance RF applications.
Key Strengths: Ultra-low signal loss, high frequency support (6 GHz), outdoor-rated, durable
Best For: Long cable runs, outdoor antennas, base stations, WISPs, 4G/5G, WiFi
What it is: A thin, flexible, budget-friendly 50Ω coaxial cable that has been a staple in the RF world for decades.
Key Strengths: Excellent flexibility, low cost, easy to work with
Best For: Short patch cables, test leads, internal equipment connections, mobile installations
| Parameter | LMR-400 | RG58 |
|---|---|---|
| Impedance | 50Ω | 50Ω |
| Max Frequency | 6 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Center Conductor | Solid Copper (BC) | Stranded or Solid Tinned Copper |
| Conductor Size | 13 AWG (1.78 mm) | 20 AWG (0.81 mm) |
| Dielectric Type | Foam PE | Solid PE |
| Shield Type | Foil + Double Braid | Single Braid (90-95%) |
| Outer Diameter | 10.29 mm (0.405") | 4.95 mm (0.195") |
| Jacket Material | PE (Outdoor Rated) | PVC (Indoor Only) |
| Flexibility | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Weight (per 100 ft) | ~12 lbs | ~3 lbs |
| Cost (per 100 ft) | ~$80-120 | ~$20-30 |
Signal loss is the single most important difference between LMR-400 and RG58. LMR-400 has dramatically lower loss at all frequencies.
| Frequency | LMR-400 (dB/100ft) | RG58 (dB/100ft) | LMR-400 Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 MHz | 0.8 dB | 2.5 dB | 68% less loss |
| 100 MHz | 1.5 dB | 4.5 dB | 67% less loss |
| 400 MHz | 3.0 dB | 9.0 dB | 67% less loss |
| 900 MHz | 3.9 dB | 16.0 dB | 76% less loss |
| 1500 MHz | 5.1 dB | 22.0 dB | 77% less loss |
| 2400 MHz (2.4 GHz) | 6.7 dB | >30 dB | LMR-400 only viable option |
| 5800 MHz (5.8 GHz) | 11.0 dB | Not Recommended | RG58 unusable at this frequency |
Here's what these numbers mean in practice:
The physical construction of these cables explains their performance differences:

LMR-400 is a professional-grade 50Ω coaxial cable designed for minimal signal loss and maximum performance.
| Advantage | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Ultra-Low Signal Loss | Run cables 100+ feet without significant signal degradation |
| High Frequency Support | Handles signals up to 6 GHz – perfect for WiFi, 5G, and modern systems |
| Outdoor Durability | PE jacket resists UV, moisture, and temperature extremes |
| Triple Shielding | Foil + double braid provides excellent interference protection |
| Versatile | Works for cellular, WiFi, GPS, amateur radio, and more |
RG58 is a thinner, more flexible 50Ω cable that has been a staple in the RF world for decades. Its main advantages are low cost and high flexibility.
| Advantage | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Excellent Flexibility | Easy to route around tight corners and in cramped spaces |
| Low Cost | Significantly cheaper than LMR-400 – about 75% less expensive |
| Lightweight | Easy to handle and install |
| Widely Available | Readily available at most electronics stores |
| Good for Short Runs | For runs under 10 feet, loss is acceptable for many applications |
| Feature | LMR-400 | RG58 |
|---|---|---|
| Impedance | 50Ω | 50Ω |
| Max Frequency | 6 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Conductor Size | 13 AWG | 20 AWG |
| Loss @ 100 MHz | 1.5 dB/100ft | 4.5 dB/100ft |
| Loss @ 900 MHz | 3.9 dB/100ft | 16.0 dB/100ft |
| Loss @ 2.4 GHz | 6.7 dB/100ft | >30 dB/100ft |
| Max Recommended Length | 100-200 ft | 10-20 ft |
| Shielding | Triple (Foil + 2 Braids) | Single Braid |
| Jacket | PE (Outdoor) | PVC (Indoor) |
| Outer Diameter | 10.29 mm | 4.95 mm |
| Flexibility | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Cost (per 100 ft) | ~$80-120 | ~$20-30 |
| Best For | Long runs, outdoor, high frequency | Short runs, flexible, budget |
| Scenario | Recommended Cable | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Outdoor WiFi antenna (2.4/5 GHz) | LMR-400 | Low loss at high frequencies, outdoor-rated |
| Indoor router to antenna (short run) | LMR-240 or RG58 | Short run, flexibility more important |
| WISP backhaul (long run) | LMR-400 or LMR-600 | Long distance, minimal loss critical |
| Scenario | Recommended Cable | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 4G/5G antenna (long run) | LMR-400 | Low loss at cellular frequencies |
| Vehicle antenna (short run) | RG58 | Flexible, short run, mobile environment |
| Base station (tower) | LMR-400 or HELIAX | Professional installation, long distance |
| Scenario | Recommended Cable | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| HF (3-30 MHz) long run | LMR-400 or RG-8 | Low loss at HF, durable |
| VHF/UHF (144/440 MHz) | LMR-400 | Low loss critical at these frequencies |
| Portable operation | RG58 | Flexible, lightweight, portable |
| Your Application | Recommended Cable |
|---|---|
| Outdoor WiFi antenna (any length) | LMR-400 |
| Long cable run (>20 ft) | LMR-400 |
| Cellular 4G/5G antenna | LMR-400 |
| Internal patch cable (under 5 ft) | RG58 |
| Test equipment leads | RG58 |
| Mobile/vehicle installation | RG58 |
| Amateur radio base station | LMR-400 |
The main difference is signal loss. LMR-400 has significantly lower attenuation (signal loss) than RG58, especially at higher frequencies. LMR-400 also has better shielding and an outdoor-rated jacket.
No. RG58 is not recommended for WiFi (2.4 GHz or 5 GHz) runs longer than 1-2 feet. The signal loss is catastrophic. Use LMR-400 or LMR-240 for WiFi applications.
Yes. LMR-400 works very well for CB radio (27 MHz). However, it's overkill for this application—RG58 or RG-8 would also work fine for CB frequencies.
For long runs, high frequencies, or outdoor installations, yes, absolutely. The performance difference is dramatic. For short, indoor, low-frequency runs, RG58 is more cost-effective.
No. RG58 has a PVC jacket that degrades in sunlight. It will crack and fail within 1-2 years outdoors. Use LMR-400 with a PE jacket for outdoor installations.
Both cables use 50Ω connectors. Common options include:
RG58 is much more flexible than LMR-400. RG58's 0.195" diameter and stranded conductor make it easy to route in tight spaces.
For 5G Sub-6 (3.5-6 GHz), LMR-400 can run 50-100 feet with acceptable loss. For longer runs, consider LMR-600 or a signal amplifier.
For VHF (144 MHz), RG58 can run 20-30 feet with acceptable loss. For longer runs, RG8 or LMR-400 is recommended.
Yes. LMR-240 is a good middle-ground option. It's more flexible than LMR-400 but has lower loss than RG58. LMR-195 is another option for shorter runs.
For short runs (under 10 feet), RG58 can work for 4G LTE. For longer runs, LMR-400 is strongly recommended to maintain signal quality.
LMR-400 can handle higher power than RG58 due to its thicker conductor. At 100 MHz, LMR-400 can handle ~500W, while RG58 handles ~100W.
We stock professional LMR-400 cables for high-performance installations and RG58 for short, flexible connections. Choose the right cable for your application.
Last Updated: July 2026
© 2026 Wassalat. All rights reserved.
check_circle
check_circle
Leave a comment